US Migrating
type: Agent

Blind Collaborative Justice Survey, 2014 [UNITED STATES]
type: Dataset
contact point: Organization
  fn: Open Data Office of Justice Programs (USDOJ)
keyword: trials
keyword: amerigeoss
keyword: geoss
keyword: united-states
keyword: geo
keyword: expert-witnesses
keyword: trial-procedures
keyword: amerigeo
keyword: national
keyword: ckan
keyword: forensic-sciences
keyword: north-america
description: These data are part of NACJD's Fast Track Release and are distributed as they there received from the data depositor. The files have been zipped by NACJD for release, but not checked or processed except of the removal of direct identifiers. Users should refer to the accompany readme file for a brief description of the files available with this collections and consult the investigator(s) if further information is needed. This study conducted an experimental investigation of two potential contributors to invalid testimony within adversarial litigation involving forensic evidence. First, the experts' knowledge of their party representation (i.e., prosecution vs. defense counsel), and secondly the lack of input from the relevant scientific community. The study used an experimental survey design with a realistic criminal case to examine the effects of blinding experts to their party representation and consensus feedback from a panel of experts to quantify and reduce testimonial bias.
issued: 2017-06-29T14:22:59
language: {eng}
modified: 2017-06-29T14:24:52

Blind Collaborative Justice Survey, 2014 [UNITED STATES]
type: Distribution
access URL: https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35258.v1
description: ICPSR35258.v1
issued: 2021-08-18T21:14:30.188717
modified: 2025-11-22T22:05:18.401805