@prefix dcat: <http://www.w3.org/ns/dcat#> .
@prefix dct: <http://purl.org/dc/terms/> .
@prefix foaf: <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/> .
@prefix gsp: <http://www.opengis.net/ont/geosparql#> .
@prefix locn: <http://www.w3.org/ns/locn#> .
@prefix vcard: <http://www.w3.org/2006/vcard/ns#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .

<https://data.amerigeoss.org/dataset/2b07bf04-97c8-46c6-a4a1-e93ab45afde1> a dcat:Dataset ;
    dct:description "The Penn Grade Micellar Displacement Project tested the micellar/polymer flooding process in a low permeability portion of the Bradford Third Sand reservoir. This test, herein referred to as the Lawry Test, followed the successful test of the micellar/polymer flooding process in a higher permeability portion of the Bradford Third Sand reservoir (Bingham Test). The Lawry Test failed technically and economically as an oil recovery process. Total oil recovery amounted to about 5.2% of the oil-in-place at the time of micellar injection. Project failure did not appear to be the reusult of poor operational practice. Project participants recognized the difficulty of applying the micellar/polymer process in such a low permeability reservoir at the initiation of the project. Nevertheless, the large reserve of oil trapped within the low permeability portions of the Bradford Field made the project attractive. There appeared to be three major reasons for project failure: (1) reservoir heterogeneity; (2) adverse ion exchange phenomena; and (3) high sulfonate loss. Data from Phase I testing, injection well tracer surveys, injection well logging, produced chloride concentrations and the Phase II evaluation well confirmed that only a small portion of the Lawry pilot was contacted by injected fluids. Produced salinity and hardness levels suggested the occurrence of adverse ion exchange phenomena. Adverse ion exchange behavior would be expected to have resulted in severe sulfonate loss, and low oil recovery. Additional data are needed to confirm this conclusion. In addition, injectivity was low throughout the project. In the absence of the above problems, it is likely that the process would not be practical in areas typical of Lawry because of low injectivity." ;
    dct:identifier "2b07bf04-97c8-46c6-a4a1-e93ab45afde1" ;
    dct:issued "2025-11-25T21:21:51.472708"^^xsd:dateTime ;
    dct:modified "2025-11-25T21:21:51.472712"^^xsd:dateTime ;
    dct:publisher <https://data.amerigeoss.org/organization/b9d8e33f-c3b6-404c-b260-b928137f5a39> ;
    dct:spatial [ a dct:Location ;
            locn:geometry "MULTIPOLYGON (((-79.3966 39.7193, -80.4291 39.7198, -80.5243 39.7212, -80.5260 40.1625, -80.5239 41.4951, -80.5226 41.8508, -80.5206 41.9869, -79.7632 42.2673, -75.3828 41.9984, -75.3457 41.9928, -75.1248 41.8492, -75.0798 41.8141, -74.7400 41.4221, -74.7053 41.3751, -74.7001 41.3506, -74.7255 40.1493, -74.7463 40.1244, -75.1429 39.8816, -75.2537 39.8455, -75.4205 39.7990, -75.7749 39.7246, -75.7911 39.7239, -76.1392 39.7222, -76.5698 39.7203, -77.4758 39.7196, -79.3966 39.7193)))"^^gsp:wktLiteral ] ;
    dct:title "Project evaluation: Penn Grade Micellar Displacement Project" ;
    dcat:contactPoint [ a vcard:Organization ;
            vcard:fn "Suffridge, F.E." ] ;
    dcat:distribution <https://data.amerigeoss.org/dataset/2b07bf04-97c8-46c6-a4a1-e93ab45afde1/resource/33cf3446-9543-43c1-82d3-4b716cbf867e> ;
    dcat:keyword "amerigeo",
        "amerigeoss",
        "bradford-third-sand",
        "ckan",
        "edx",
        "energy",
        "energy-data-exchange",
        "geo",
        "geology",
        "geoss",
        "global",
        "lawry-test",
        "micellar-displacement",
        "permeability",
        "physical-properties" .

<https://data.amerigeoss.org/dataset/2b07bf04-97c8-46c6-a4a1-e93ab45afde1/resource/33cf3446-9543-43c1-82d3-4b716cbf867e> a dcat:Distribution ;
    dct:description "The Penn Grade Micellar Displacement Project was a tertiary oil recovery pilot test of the micellar/polymer process in a low permeability portion of the Bradford Field, located in McKean County, Pennsylvania. The project was performed in a 24-acre tract, known as the Lawry Farm, in the Bradford Third Sand. Funding was provided at the 50 percent level by the Department of Energy (DOE) with the ~alance of costs shared equally by the Pennzoil Company1_guaker State Oil Refining Corporation and Witco Chemical Corporation. Pennzoil Company operated the pilot test. Fluid design work was performed by Marathon Oil Company. The test was patterned after the earlier, successful, Bingham test of the micellar/polymer process. The Bingham test was performed in a more permeable portion of the Bradford Third Sand. The purpose of this report is to review and evaluate Lawry project performance and to compare performance to the Bingham Test." ;
    dct:format "PDF" ;
    dct:issued "2014-07-03T12:57:11.031245"^^xsd:dateTime ;
    dct:modified "2025-11-25T21:21:51.463792"^^xsd:dateTime ;
    dct:title "FE_BC10033_10.pdf" ;
    dcat:accessURL <https://edx.netl.doe.gov/storage/f/2014-07-03T16%3A55%3A47.283Z/fe-bc10033-10.pdf> ;
    dcat:byteSize "3927170"^^xsd:nonNegativeInteger .

<https://data.amerigeoss.org/organization/b9d8e33f-c3b6-404c-b260-b928137f5a39> a foaf:Agent ;
    foaf:name "Energy Data Exchange" .