Accuracy of Rapid Crop Cover Map of Conterminous United States for 2015

Spatially accurate annual crop cover maps are an important component to various planning and research applications; however, the importance of these maps varies significantly with the timing of their availability. Utilizing a previously developed crop classification model (CCM), which was used to generate historical annual crop cover maps (classifying nine major crops: corn, cotton, sorghum, soybeans, spring wheat, winter wheat, alfalfa, other hay/non alfalfa, fallow/idle cropland, and ‘other’ as one class for remaining crops), we hypothesized that such crop cover maps could be generated in near real time (NRT). The CCM was trained on 14 temporal and 15 static geospatial datasets, known as predictor variables, and the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) Cropland Data Layers (CDL) was used as the dependent variable. We were able to generate a NRT crop cover map by the first day of September through a process of incrementally removing weekly and monthly data from the CCM and comparing the subsequent map results with the original maps and NASS CDLs. Initially, our NRT results revealed training error of 1.4% and test error of 8.3%, as compared to 1.0% and 7.6%, respectively for the original CCM. Through the implementation of a new ‘two-mapping model’ approach, we were able to substantially improve the results of the NRT crop cover model. We divided the NRT model into one ‘crop type model’ to handle the classification of the nine specific crops and a second, binary model to classify crops as presence or absence of the ‘other’ crop. Under the two-mapping model approach, the training errors were 0.8% and 1.5% for the crop type and binary model, respectively, while test errors were 5.5% and 6.4% for crop type and binary model, respectively. With overall mapping accuracy for the map reaching 57.57 percent, this approach shows strong potential for generating crop type maps of current year in September.

Data and Resources

Field Value
accessLevel public
bureauCode {010:12}
catalog_@context https://project-open-data.cio.gov/v1.1/schema/catalog.jsonld
catalog_conformsTo https://project-open-data.cio.gov/v1.1/schema
catalog_describedBy https://project-open-data.cio.gov/v1.1/schema/catalog.json
identifier USGS:5a8701ade4b00f54eb3a2b17
metadata_type geospatial
modified 20200818
old-spatial -125.85937500000001, 24.04646399966658, -66.09375000000001, 49.49667452747045
publisher U.S. Geological Survey
publisher_hierarchy Department of the Interior > U.S. Geological Survey
resource-type Dataset
source_datajson_identifier true
source_hash f209146fcb0dad0d18d7f6286d0159c835f18a77
source_schema_version 1.1
spatial {"type": "Polygon", "coordinates": [[[-125.85937500000001, 24.04646399966658], [-125.85937500000001, 49.49667452747045], [ -66.09375000000001, 49.49667452747045], [ -66.09375000000001, 24.04646399966658], [-125.85937500000001, 24.04646399966658]]]}
theme {geospatial}
Groups
  • AmeriGEOSS
  • National Provider
  • North America
Tags
  • amerigeo
  • amerigeoss
  • ckan
  • conus
  • crop-cover-mapping
  • geo
  • geoss
  • modelling
  • national
  • near-real-time
  • north-america
  • united-states
  • usgs-5a8701ade4b00f54eb3a2b17
isopen False
license_id notspecified
license_title License not specified
maintainer Devendra Dahal (CTR)
maintainer_email devendra.dahal.ctr@usgs.gov
metadata_created 2025-11-20T18:09:31.503655
metadata_modified 2025-11-20T18:09:31.503659
notes Spatially accurate annual crop cover maps are an important component to various planning and research applications; however, the importance of these maps varies significantly with the timing of their availability. Utilizing a previously developed crop classification model (CCM), which was used to generate historical annual crop cover maps (classifying nine major crops: corn, cotton, sorghum, soybeans, spring wheat, winter wheat, alfalfa, other hay/non alfalfa, fallow/idle cropland, and ‘other’ as one class for remaining crops), we hypothesized that such crop cover maps could be generated in near real time (NRT). The CCM was trained on 14 temporal and 15 static geospatial datasets, known as predictor variables, and the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) Cropland Data Layers (CDL) was used as the dependent variable. We were able to generate a NRT crop cover map by the first day of September through a process of incrementally removing weekly and monthly data from the CCM and comparing the subsequent map results with the original maps and NASS CDLs. Initially, our NRT results revealed training error of 1.4% and test error of 8.3%, as compared to 1.0% and 7.6%, respectively for the original CCM. Through the implementation of a new ‘two-mapping model’ approach, we were able to substantially improve the results of the NRT crop cover model. We divided the NRT model into one ‘crop type model’ to handle the classification of the nine specific crops and a second, binary model to classify crops as presence or absence of the ‘other’ crop. Under the two-mapping model approach, the training errors were 0.8% and 1.5% for the crop type and binary model, respectively, while test errors were 5.5% and 6.4% for crop type and binary model, respectively. With overall mapping accuracy for the map reaching 57.57 percent, this approach shows strong potential for generating crop type maps of current year in September.
num_resources 2
num_tags 13
title Accuracy of Rapid Crop Cover Map of Conterminous United States for 2015