LEAN-Corrected Chesapeake Bay Digital Elevation Models, 2019

Lidar-derived digital elevation models often contain a vertical bias due to vegetation. In areas with tidal influence the amount of bias can be ecologically significant, for example, by decreasing the expected inundation frequency. We generated a corrected digital elevation mode (DEM) for Chesapeake Bay using a modification of the Lidar Elevation Adjustment with NDVI (LEAN) technique (Buffington et al. 2016). GPS survey data (3699 points, collected across four tidal marsh sites (Eastern Neck, Bishops Head, Martin, and Blackwater) in 2010 and 2017, Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) derived from an airborne multispectral image (2013), a 1 m lidar DEM and a 1 m canopy surface model were used to generate models of predicted bias across the study domain. The modeled predicted bias for each cover type was then subtracted from the original lidar DEM to generate a new DEM. Across all GPS points, mean initial lidar error was -1.0 centimeters (SD=12.8) and root-mean squared error (RMSE) was 12.8 centimeters. After correction with LEAN, mean error was 0 cm (SD=6.4) and RMSE was 6.4 cm, a 50 percent improvement in accuracy. References: Buffington, K.J., Dugger, B.D., Thorne, K.M. and Takekawa, J.Y., 2016. Statistical correction of lidar-derived digital elevation models with multispectral airborne imagery in tidal marshes. Remote Sensing of Environment, 186, pp.616-625.

Data and Resources

Field Value
accessLevel public
bureauCode {010:12}
catalog_@context https://project-open-data.cio.gov/v1.1/schema/catalog.jsonld
catalog_conformsTo https://project-open-data.cio.gov/v1.1/schema
catalog_describedBy https://project-open-data.cio.gov/v1.1/schema/catalog.json
identifier USGS:5d40de0ee4b01d82ce8da08a
metadata_type geospatial
modified 20211116
old-spatial -76.3389, 37.91850, -75.8596, 39.1004
publisher U.S. Geological Survey
publisher_hierarchy Department of the Interior > U.S. Geological Survey
resource-type Dataset
source_datajson_identifier true
source_hash 2c94378e80c8683c104b6af17895d0331d95d3b6
source_schema_version 1.1
spatial {"type": "Polygon", "coordinates": [[[-76.3389, 37.91850], [-76.3389, 39.1004], [ -75.8596, 39.1004], [ -75.8596, 37.91850], [-76.3389, 37.91850]]]}
theme {geospatial}
Groups
  • AmeriGEOSS
  • National Provider
  • North America
Tags
  • amerigeo
  • amerigeoss
  • biota
  • ckan
  • digital-elevation-models
  • estuary
  • geo
  • geoss
  • lidar
  • national
  • north-america
  • united-states
  • usgs-5d40de0ee4b01d82ce8da08a
  • wetlands
isopen False
license_id notspecified
license_title License not specified
maintainer U.S. Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center
maintainer_email gs-b-werc_data_management@usgs.gov
metadata_created 2025-11-20T21:57:48.709370
metadata_modified 2025-11-20T21:57:48.709374
notes Lidar-derived digital elevation models often contain a vertical bias due to vegetation. In areas with tidal influence the amount of bias can be ecologically significant, for example, by decreasing the expected inundation frequency. We generated a corrected digital elevation mode (DEM) for Chesapeake Bay using a modification of the Lidar Elevation Adjustment with NDVI (LEAN) technique (Buffington et al. 2016). GPS survey data (3699 points, collected across four tidal marsh sites (Eastern Neck, Bishops Head, Martin, and Blackwater) in 2010 and 2017, Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) derived from an airborne multispectral image (2013), a 1 m lidar DEM and a 1 m canopy surface model were used to generate models of predicted bias across the study domain. The modeled predicted bias for each cover type was then subtracted from the original lidar DEM to generate a new DEM. Across all GPS points, mean initial lidar error was -1.0 centimeters (SD=12.8) and root-mean squared error (RMSE) was 12.8 centimeters. After correction with LEAN, mean error was 0 cm (SD=6.4) and RMSE was 6.4 cm, a 50 percent improvement in accuracy. References: Buffington, K.J., Dugger, B.D., Thorne, K.M. and Takekawa, J.Y., 2016. Statistical correction of lidar-derived digital elevation models with multispectral airborne imagery in tidal marshes. Remote Sensing of Environment, 186, pp.616-625.
num_resources 2
num_tags 14
title LEAN-Corrected Chesapeake Bay Digital Elevation Models, 2019