Linking Theory to Practice: Examining Geospatial Predictive Policing, Denver, Colorado, 2013-2015

This research sought to examine and evaluate geospatial predictive policing models across the United States. The purpose of this applied research is three-fold: (1) to link theory and appropriate data/measures to the practice of predictive policing; (2) to determine the accuracy of various predictive policing algorithms to include traditional hotspot analyses, regression-based analyses, and data-mining algorithms; and (3) to determine how algorithms perform in a predictive policing process. Specifically, the research project sought to answer questions such as:

What are the underlying criminological theories that guide the development of the algorithms and subsequent strategies? What data are needed in what capacity and when? What types of software and hardware are useful and necessary? How does predictive policing "work" in the field? What is the practical utility of it? How do we measure the impacts of predictive policing?

The project's primary phases included: (1) employing report card strategies to analyze, review and evaluate available data sources, software and analytic methods; (2) reviewing the literature on predictive tools and predictive strategies; and (3) evaluating how police agencies and researchers tested predictive algorithms and predictive policing processes.

Data and Resources

Field Value
accessLevel restricted public
aiCategory Not AI-ready
bureauCode {011:21}
catalog_@context https://project-open-data.cio.gov/v1.1/schema/catalog.jsonld
catalog_@id https://www.justice.gov/data.json
catalog_conformsTo https://project-open-data.cio.gov/v1.1/schema
catalog_describedBy https://project-open-data.cio.gov/v1.1/schema/catalog.json
identifier 3631
internalContactPoint {"@type": "vcard:Contact", "fn": "Jennifer Scherer", "hasEmail": "mailto:Jennifer.Scherer@usdoj.gov"}
issued 2020-02-26T09:19:10
jcamSystem {"acronym": "OJP_EXT", "id": 8, "name": "External system not available in CSAM"}
language {eng}
license http://www.usa.gov/publicdomain/label/1.0/
metadataModified 9/2/2022 6:22:00 PM
modified 2020-02-26T09:27:00
programCode {011:060}
publisher National Institute of Justice
publisher_hierarchy Office of Justice Programs > National Institute of Justice
resource-type Dataset
rights These data are restricted due to the increased risk of violation of confidentiality of respondent and subject data.
sourceIdentifier https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR37299
source_datajson_identifier true
source_hash d3b6259b3e3c95a57422e91addb98b39c42a67dffa04e21063ff1f5884b39e22
source_schema_version 1.1
Groups
  • AmeriGEOSS
  • National Provider
  • North America
Tags
  • AmeriGEO
  • AmeriGEOSS
  • CKAN
  • GEO
  • GEOSS
  • National
  • North America
  • United States
  • crime-mapping
  • crime-prediction
  • forecasting-models
  • police-departments
  • police-reports
isopen False
license_id us-pd
license_title us-pd
maintainer Open Data Office of Justice Programs (USDOJ)
maintainer_email opendata@usdoj.gov
metadata_created 2025-09-24T04:00:52.269484
metadata_modified 2025-09-24T04:00:52.269494
notes This research sought to examine and evaluate geospatial predictive policing models across the United States. The purpose of this applied research is three-fold: (1) to link theory and appropriate data/measures to the practice of predictive policing; (2) to determine the accuracy of various predictive policing algorithms to include traditional hotspot analyses, regression-based analyses, and data-mining algorithms; and (3) to determine how algorithms perform in a predictive policing process. Specifically, the research project sought to answer questions such as: What are the underlying criminological theories that guide the development of the algorithms and subsequent strategies? What data are needed in what capacity and when? What types of software and hardware are useful and necessary? How does predictive policing "work" in the field? What is the practical utility of it? How do we measure the impacts of predictive policing? The project's primary phases included: (1) employing report card strategies to analyze, review and evaluate available data sources, software and analytic methods; (2) reviewing the literature on predictive tools and predictive strategies; and (3) evaluating how police agencies and researchers tested predictive algorithms and predictive policing processes.
num_resources 1
num_tags 13
title Linking Theory to Practice: Examining Geospatial Predictive Policing, Denver, Colorado, 2013-2015