Mapping Cheatgrass Dieoff in the Northern Great Basin using Ecosystem Performance Modeling

The dataset contains a time series of cheatgrass dieoff maps covering the western and central areas of the northern Great Basin. This dataset maps annual cheatgrass performance in the northern Great Basin, USA, from 2000-2010, using the dynamic monitoring of ecosystem performance (DMEP) method. The power of DMEP is that it separates weather-related performance issues from disturbance- and management-related performance issues by integrating satellite data with land cover data, seasonal weather data, and a site potential dataset into a regression-tree model. The resulting model is called the expected cheatgrass performance (ECP) model, and this model performed well (R-square equaled 0.88). The EEP model results are statistically compared to a dataset that serves as proxy for actual cheatgrass performance (see the metadata for the cheatgrass cover dataset for a full explanation), and at the 80% confidence interval, normal performing cheatgrass areas are differentiated from both underperforming and overperforming cheatgrass areas. The underperforming cheatgrass areas represent potential cheatgrass dieoff. Dieoff areas concern land managers, scientists, and policy makers because they allow the invasion of new weed species, accelerate soil erosion, reduce early spring forage for livestock and wildlife, and present unknown recovery pathways.

Data and Resources

Field Value
accessLevel public
bureauCode {010:00}
catalog_@context https://project-open-data.cio.gov/v1.1/schema/catalog.jsonld
catalog_conformsTo https://project-open-data.cio.gov/v1.1/schema
catalog_describedBy https://project-open-data.cio.gov/v1.1/schema/catalog.json
datagov_dedupe_retained 20220725164314
identifier f6117554-8415-4008-860d-5accccc906f8
metadata_type geospatial
modified 2012-07-10
old-spatial {"type": "Polygon", "coordinates": [[[-122.263892, 39.133354], [-113.636308, 39.133354], [-113.636308, 45.225297], [-122.263892, 45.225297], [-122.263892, 39.133354]]]}
publisher Climate Adaptation Science Centers
resource-type Dataset
source_datajson_identifier true
source_hash d69d01a9d75cf6de4aa9685efee6acb46e3c59ff
source_schema_version 1.1
spatial {"type": "Polygon", "coordinates": [[[-122.263892, 39.133354], [-113.636308, 39.133354], [-113.636308, 45.225297], [-122.263892, 45.225297], [-122.263892, 39.133354]]]}
theme {geospatial}
Groups
  • AmeriGEOSS
  • National Provider
  • North America
Tags
  • 2000-2010
  • amerigeo
  • amerigeoss
  • cheatgrass-dieoff
  • ckan
  • geo
  • geoss
  • national
  • north-america
  • northern-great-basin
  • united-states
  • usa
isopen False
license_id notspecified
license_title License not specified
maintainer US Geological Survey Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center (Point of Contact)
maintainer_email wylie@usgs.gov
metadata_created 2025-11-21T16:03:20.919980
metadata_modified 2025-11-21T16:03:20.919984
notes The dataset contains a time series of cheatgrass dieoff maps covering the western and central areas of the northern Great Basin. This dataset maps annual cheatgrass performance in the northern Great Basin, USA, from 2000-2010, using the dynamic monitoring of ecosystem performance (DMEP) method. The power of DMEP is that it separates weather-related performance issues from disturbance- and management-related performance issues by integrating satellite data with land cover data, seasonal weather data, and a site potential dataset into a regression-tree model. The resulting model is called the expected cheatgrass performance (ECP) model, and this model performed well (R-square equaled 0.88). The EEP model results are statistically compared to a dataset that serves as proxy for actual cheatgrass performance (see the metadata for the cheatgrass cover dataset for a full explanation), and at the 80% confidence interval, normal performing cheatgrass areas are differentiated from both underperforming and overperforming cheatgrass areas. The underperforming cheatgrass areas represent potential cheatgrass dieoff. Dieoff areas concern land managers, scientists, and policy makers because they allow the invasion of new weed species, accelerate soil erosion, reduce early spring forage for livestock and wildlife, and present unknown recovery pathways.
num_resources 3
num_tags 12
title Mapping Cheatgrass Dieoff in the Northern Great Basin using Ecosystem Performance Modeling