Northeast Lake and Pond Classification (Report)

Citation: Olivero-Sheldon, A. and M.G. Anderson. 2016. Northeast Lake and Pond Classification. The Nature Conservancy, Eastern Conservation Science, Eastern Regional Office. Boston, MA.

Abstract

We developed a mapped classification of lakes and ponds based on facors that structure lacustrine ecosystems and that could be mapped consistently across Northeastern US. The classification was based upon four key variables: water temperature, alkalinity, trophic state, and depth. Water temperature was mapped into three classes (very cold, cold, and cool-warm) to reflect the requirements and limits of aquatic organisms. Alkalinity was grouped into three classes (high, medium, low) to reflect how well the lake system was buffered from acidification. Trophic states, representing the productivity of a lake, were mapped into two classes (oligotrophic-mesotrophic and eutrophic-hypereutrophic). Depth was divided into two classes (lake, pond) using maximum depth and trophic status to estimate whether light penetrates to the bottom of the waterbody. A steering committee of state and regional experts contributed sampled data with measured values of these and other variables for waterbodies in their states. To create the mapped classification, we compiled the location of every waterbody in the region (n = 36,675), and for each waterbody we generated over 300 descriptive attributes including: morphology, dams, climate, soils, geology, conservation lands, landforms, and land cover in the watershed. We to develop a predictive model for each variable class based on the sampled data points, and we then extrapolated the model to the unsampled waterbodies used Random Forest software to estimate their class based on their descriptive attributes. All waterbodies were assigned to one of 18 classification types based on the combination of three variables: temperature class, trophic state class, alkalinity class. These types can be further subdivided into lake or pond categories to yield mapped occurrences of 36 waterbody types, for example: cold, oligotrophic-mesotrophic, low alkalinity, lake.

Data and Resources

Field Value
accessLevel public
bureauCode {010:00}
catalog_@context https://project-open-data.cio.gov/v1.1/schema/catalog.jsonld
catalog_conformsTo https://project-open-data.cio.gov/v1.1/schema
catalog_describedBy https://project-open-data.cio.gov/v1.1/schema/catalog.json
datagov_dedupe_retained 20211110222844
identifier 5a592bfbe4b00b291cd6a99e
metadata_type geospatial
modified 2018-08-20
publisher LCC Network
resource-type Dataset
source_datajson_identifier true
source_hash c4b96c15abd1a5de980bd6094800bd42e1e30c32
source_schema_version 1.1
theme {geospatial}
Groups
  • AmeriGEOSS
  • National Provider
  • North America
Tags
  • amerigeo
  • amerigeoss
  • aquatic-ecosystems
  • ckan
  • eutrophic
  • geo
  • geoss
  • lake-alkalinity
  • lake-depth
  • lake-temperature
  • lakes
  • mesotrophic
  • national
  • north-america
  • oligotrophic
  • ponds
  • united-states
isopen False
license_id notspecified
license_title License not specified
maintainer (Point of Contact); North Atlantic Landscape Conservation Cooperative (Point of Contact)
maintainer_email lccdatasteward@fws.gov
metadata_created 2025-11-20T01:29:18.207558
metadata_modified 2025-11-20T01:29:18.207562
notes Citation:&nbsp;Olivero-Sheldon, A. and M.G. Anderson. 2016. Northeast Lake and Pond Classification. The Nature Conservancy, Eastern Conservation Science, Eastern Regional Office. Boston, MA.<br> <br> <u>Abstract</u><br> <br> We developed a mapped classification of lakes and ponds based on facors that structure lacustrine ecosystems and that could be mapped consistently across Northeastern US. The classification was based upon four key variables: water temperature, alkalinity, trophic state, and depth. Water temperature was mapped into three classes (very cold, cold, and cool-warm) to reflect the requirements and limits of aquatic organisms. Alkalinity was grouped into three classes (high, medium, low) to reflect how well the lake system was buffered from acidification. Trophic states, representing the productivity of a lake, were mapped into two classes (oligotrophic-mesotrophic and eutrophic-hypereutrophic). Depth was divided into two classes (lake, pond) using maximum depth and trophic status to estimate whether light penetrates to the bottom of the waterbody. A steering committee of state and regional experts contributed sampled data with measured values of these and other variables for waterbodies in their states. To create the mapped classification, we compiled the location of every waterbody in the region (n = 36,675), and for each waterbody we generated over 300 descriptive attributes including: morphology, dams, climate, soils, geology, conservation lands, landforms, and land cover in the watershed. We to develop a predictive model for each variable class based on the sampled data points, and we then extrapolated the model to the unsampled waterbodies used Random Forest software to estimate their class based on their descriptive attributes. All waterbodies were assigned to one of 18 classification types based on the combination of three variables: temperature class, trophic state class, alkalinity class. These types can be further subdivided into lake or pond categories to yield mapped occurrences of 36 waterbody types, for example: cold, oligotrophic-mesotrophic, low alkalinity, lake.
num_resources 4
num_tags 17
title Northeast Lake and Pond Classification (Report)