Reconciling precipitation trends in Alaska: 2. Gridded data analyses

There is a great deal of interest in whether and how Alaska's precipitation is changing but little agreement in the existing peer-reviewed literature. To provide insight on this question, we have selected three commonly used 0.5° resolution gridded precipitation products that have long-term monthly data coverage (Climatic Research Unit TS3.10.1, Global Precipitation Climatology Centre Full Data Reanalysis version 5, and University of Delaware version 2.01) and evaluated their homogeneity and trends with multiple methods over two periods, 1950–2008 and 1980–2008. All three data sets displayed common broadscale features of Alaska's precipitation climatology, but there were substantial differences between them in terms of average precipitation amount and interannual variability. Temporal inhomogeneity was a significant concern over Alaska in gridded precipitation products, as it was in the state's coastal weather stations. Although underlying station inhomogeneities were inherited to some extent by all of the gridded data sets, differences in data set construction contributed to dissimilarities in inhomogeneity, as well. There were contrasts in trends between the two time periods, and some minor discrepancies occurred as a function of the trend detection method, but the main disparities stemmed from choice of data set. Indeed, there were large areas where these data sets disagreed on both the sign and significance of precipitation trends. Until further analysis can resolve these differences, researchers using gridded precipitation data or evaluating studies based on such data should interpret results with extreme caution.

Data and Resources

Field Value
accessLevel public
bureauCode {010:00}
catalog_@context https://project-open-data.cio.gov/v1.1/schema/catalog.jsonld
catalog_conformsTo https://project-open-data.cio.gov/v1.1/schema
catalog_describedBy https://project-open-data.cio.gov/v1.1/schema/catalog.json
identifier feb1454a-bb11-45c1-82c3-8cc0b3358348
metadata_type geospatial
modified 2019-09-09T00:35:40-08:00
old-spatial {"type": "Polygon", "coordinates": [[[-179.999988541, 51.3761358992], [-130.00309157, 51.3761358992], [-130.00309157, 71.437468666], [-179.999988541, 71.437468666], [-179.999988541, 51.3761358992]]]}
publisher LCC Network
resource-type Dataset
source_datajson_identifier true
source_hash 476a614e8c159c84d251c6fd0d1050800474bfbf
source_schema_version 1.1
spatial {"type": "Polygon", "coordinates": [[[-179.999988541, 51.3761358992], [-130.00309157, 51.3761358992], [-130.00309157, 71.437468666], [-179.999988541, 71.437468666], [-179.999988541, 51.3761358992]]]}
theme {geospatial}
Groups
  • AmeriGEOSS
  • National Provider
  • North America
Tags
  • academics-scientific-researchers
  • amerigeo
  • amerigeoss
  • ckan
  • climatologymeteorologyatmosphere
  • geo
  • geoss
  • national
  • north-america
  • precipitation-trends
  • united-states
isopen False
license_id notspecified
license_title License not specified
maintainer (Point of Contact); Arctic Landscape Conservation Cooperative (Point of Contact, Publisher)
maintainer_email lccdatasteward@fws.gov
metadata_created 2025-11-22T07:13:57.387370
metadata_modified 2025-11-22T07:13:57.387374
notes There is a great deal of interest in whether and how Alaska's precipitation is changing but little agreement in the existing peer-reviewed literature. To provide insight on this question, we have selected three commonly used 0.5° resolution gridded precipitation products that have long-term monthly data coverage (Climatic Research Unit TS3.10.1, Global Precipitation Climatology Centre Full Data Reanalysis version 5, and University of Delaware version 2.01) and evaluated their homogeneity and trends with multiple methods over two periods, 1950–2008 and 1980–2008. All three data sets displayed common broadscale features of Alaska's precipitation climatology, but there were substantial differences between them in terms of average precipitation amount and interannual variability. Temporal inhomogeneity was a significant concern over Alaska in gridded precipitation products, as it was in the state's coastal weather stations. Although underlying station inhomogeneities were inherited to some extent by all of the gridded data sets, differences in data set construction contributed to dissimilarities in inhomogeneity, as well. There were contrasts in trends between the two time periods, and some minor discrepancies occurred as a function of the trend detection method, but the main disparities stemmed from choice of data set. Indeed, there were large areas where these data sets disagreed on both the sign and significance of precipitation trends. Until further analysis can resolve these differences, researchers using gridded precipitation data or evaluating studies based on such data should interpret results with extreme caution.
num_resources 12
num_tags 11
title Reconciling precipitation trends in Alaska: 2. Gridded data analyses