TEAMER: Cross-flow Turbine Hydrodynamics

The objective of this work is to validate RANS and LES computations of cross-flow turbine hydrodynamics using laboratory scale measurements. Validation involves the comparison of time-and phase averaged performance metrics and flowfields across the widest practical range of turbine kinematics and geometry. Turbine performance was monitored use a series of six-axis load cells and flowfields were measured using a particle image velocimetry (PIV), both within the rotor and in the wake. Six test cases were chosen. Three involve operating a turbine with symmetric foils at a constant rotation rate and under intracycle speed control (both optimally and sub-optimally). Intracycle control of cross-flow turbines has been shown to have significant potential to increase turbine power output. Such control significantly modulates separation and recovery dynamics and therefore poses a challenging set of cases for simulation validation. The second group of three cases kept the rotation rate constant while varying the geometric camber of the foils by up to 2% in either direction. By changing camber, the pressure gradients and flow curvature on the surface of the blade can be varied, providing a significant test of the efficacy of near-blade modelling.

A total of six primary validation cases are explored in two broad categories. For each of these cases experimental and computational performance and flowfields are compared. A significantly greater number of experimental and computational cases were obtained to broaden the parameter space and to inform the sensitivity of either the experimental or computational parameter space, some of which are summarized below. Exploration of intracycle control kinematics for a two-bladed turbine: (1) Optimal tip-speed ratio for constant speed control. (2) Intracycle kinematics corresponding to optimum power enhancement at the same mean tip-speed ratio (3) Intracycle kinematics corresponding to poor performance at the same mean tip-speed ratio Exploration of cambered blade geometry for a one-bladed turbine operating under constant speed control: (4) Symmetric NACA 0018 foil at TSR = 2 (5) Cambered NACA +2418 foil at TSR = 2 (6) Cambered NACA -2418 foil at TSR = 2

A portion of the intracycle control data were published by Athair et al (2023) and presented at EWTEC 2023. See "Intracycle Control Sensitivity of Cross-Flow Turbines" resource below.

A portion of the cambered foil data is being prepared for peer reviewed publication which will be added to this submission when available. A. Athair, C. Consing, J. Frank, O. Williams. The impacts of geometric camber on cross-flow turbine performance and hydrodynamics.

Both experimental and corresponding simulation data are available in this dataset. The simulation data were generated by the team of Jennifer Franck at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.

Data and Resources

Field Value
accessLevel public
bureauCode {019:20}
catalog_@context https://openei.org/data.json
catalog_@id https://openei.org/data.json
catalog_conformsTo https://project-open-data.cio.gov/v1.1/schema
catalog_describedBy https://project-open-data.cio.gov/v1.1/schema/catalog.json
dataQuality true
identifier https://data.openei.org/submissions/8411
issued 2025-03-25T06:00:00Z
landingPage https://mhkdr.openei.org/submissions/610
license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
modified 2025-05-11T06:00:02Z
old-spatial {"type":"Polygon","coordinates":[[[-122.31148849220033,43.0755143],[-89.4180275,43.0755143],[-89.4180275,47.65001901611784],[-122.31148849220033,47.65001901611784],[-122.31148849220033,43.0755143]]]}
programCode {019:009}
projectLead Lauren Ruedy
projectNumber EE0008895
projectTitle TEAMER Program
publisher University of Washington (NNMREC)
resource-type Dataset
source_datajson_identifier true
source_hash 4cb3909b3e555028c71f7e4a6fd9acf0f406f5f443b53f7a004cb1365952ec5c
source_schema_version 1.1
spatial {"type":"Polygon","coordinates":[[[-122.31148849220033,43.0755143],[-89.4180275,43.0755143],[-89.4180275,47.65001901611784],[-122.31148849220033,47.65001901611784],[-122.31148849220033,43.0755143]]]}
Groups
  • AmeriGEOSS
  • National Provider
  • North America
Tags
  • AmeriGEO
  • AmeriGEOSS
  • CKAN
  • GEO
  • GEOSS
  • National
  • North America
  • United States
  • cross-flow
  • cross-flow-turbine
  • data
  • energy
  • hydrodynamics
  • hydrokinetic
  • les
  • marine
  • mhk
  • power
  • processed-data
  • rans
  • teamer
  • turbine
  • validation
isopen True
license_id cc-by
license_title Creative Commons Attribution
license_url http://www.opendefinition.org/licenses/cc-by
maintainer Owen Williams
maintainer_email ojhw@uw.edu
metadata_created 2025-09-23T22:09:16.994803
metadata_modified 2025-09-23T22:09:16.994810
notes The objective of this work is to validate RANS and LES computations of cross-flow turbine hydrodynamics using laboratory scale measurements. Validation involves the comparison of time-and phase averaged performance metrics and flowfields across the widest practical range of turbine kinematics and geometry. Turbine performance was monitored use a series of six-axis load cells and flowfields were measured using a particle image velocimetry (PIV), both within the rotor and in the wake. Six test cases were chosen. Three involve operating a turbine with symmetric foils at a constant rotation rate and under intracycle speed control (both optimally and sub-optimally). Intracycle control of cross-flow turbines has been shown to have significant potential to increase turbine power output. Such control significantly modulates separation and recovery dynamics and therefore poses a challenging set of cases for simulation validation. The second group of three cases kept the rotation rate constant while varying the geometric camber of the foils by up to 2% in either direction. By changing camber, the pressure gradients and flow curvature on the surface of the blade can be varied, providing a significant test of the efficacy of near-blade modelling. A total of six primary validation cases are explored in two broad categories. For each of these cases experimental and computational performance and flowfields are compared. A significantly greater number of experimental and computational cases were obtained to broaden the parameter space and to inform the sensitivity of either the experimental or computational parameter space, some of which are summarized below. Exploration of intracycle control kinematics for a two-bladed turbine: (1) Optimal tip-speed ratio for constant speed control. (2) Intracycle kinematics corresponding to optimum power enhancement at the same mean tip-speed ratio (3) Intracycle kinematics corresponding to poor performance at the same mean tip-speed ratio Exploration of cambered blade geometry for a one-bladed turbine operating under constant speed control: (4) Symmetric NACA 0018 foil at TSR = 2 (5) Cambered NACA +2418 foil at TSR = 2 (6) Cambered NACA -2418 foil at TSR = 2 A portion of the intracycle control data were published by Athair et al (2023) and presented at EWTEC 2023. See "Intracycle Control Sensitivity of Cross-Flow Turbines" resource below. A portion of the cambered foil data is being prepared for peer reviewed publication which will be added to this submission when available. A. Athair, C. Consing, J. Frank, O. Williams. The impacts of geometric camber on cross-flow turbine performance and hydrodynamics. Both experimental and corresponding simulation data are available in this dataset. The simulation data were generated by the team of Jennifer Franck at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.
num_resources 7
num_tags 23
title TEAMER: Cross-flow Turbine Hydrodynamics