Environmental DNA metabarcoding as a tool for biodiversity assessment and monitoring: Reconstructing established fish communities of north-temperate lakes and rivers

To evaluate the ability of precipitation-based environmental DNA (eDNA) sample collection and mitochondrial 12S metabarcoding sequencing to reconstruct well-studied fish communities in lakes and rivers. Specific objectives were to 1) determine correlations between eDNA species detections and known community composition based on traditional field sampling, 2) compare efficiency of eDNA to detect fish biodiversity among systems with variable morphologies and trophic states, and 3) determine if species habitat preferences predicts eDNA detection.
Fish community composition was estimated for seven lakes and two MIssissippi River navigation pools using sequence data from the mitochonrial 12S gene amplified from 10 to 50 water samples per waterbody collected in 50-mL centrifuge tubes at a single time point. Environmental DNA (eDNA) was concentrated without filtration by centrifuging samples to reduce per-sample handling time. Taxonomic detections from eDNA were compared to established community monitoring databases containing up to 40 years of sampling and a detailed habitat/substrate preference matrix to identify patterns of bias. Mitochondrial 12S gene metabarcoding detectec 15-47% of the known species at each waterbody and 30-76% of known genera. Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) assessment of the community structure indicated that eDNA detected communities grouped in a similar pattern as known communities. Discriminant analysis of principal components indicated that there was a high degree of overlap in habitat/substrate preference of eDNA detected and eDNA undetected species suggesting limited habitat bias for eDNA sampling. Large numbers of small volume samples sequenced at the mitochondrial 12S gene can describe the course community structure of freshwater systems. However, additional traditional sampling and environmental DNA sampling may be necessary for a complete diversity census.

Data e Risorse

Campo Valore
accessLevel public
bureauCode {010:12}
catalog_@context https://project-open-data.cio.gov/v1.1/schema/catalog.jsonld
catalog_conformsTo https://project-open-data.cio.gov/v1.1/schema
catalog_describedBy https://project-open-data.cio.gov/v1.1/schema/catalog.json
identifier USGS:606e14fed34ef99870162be7
metadata_type geospatial
modified 20211115
old-spatial -91.101199999996, 40.77638, -89.3696, 46.07893
publisher U.S. Geological Survey
publisher_hierarchy Department of the Interior > U.S. Geological Survey
resource-type Dataset
source_datajson_identifier true
source_hash 3ecc6e23521e02d8fc2dda45a3e2712ef993c848
source_schema_version 1.1
spatial {"type": "Polygon", "coordinates": [[[-91.101199999996, 40.77638], [-91.101199999996, 46.07893], [ -89.3696, 46.07893], [ -89.3696, 40.77638], [-91.101199999996, 40.77638]]]}
theme {geospatial}
Gruppi
  • AmeriGEOSS
  • National Provider
  • North America
Tag
  • 12s-gene
  • amerigeo
  • amerigeoss
  • biota
  • ckan
  • community-ecology
  • crystal-lake
  • environmental-dna
  • fisheries
  • geo
  • geoss
  • habitat
  • lake-mendota
  • lake-wingra
  • mcdermott-lake
  • metagenomics
  • national
  • none
  • north-america
  • sparkling-lake
  • trout-bog
  • trout-lake
  • united-states
  • upper-mississippi-river
  • upper-mississippi-river-pool-13
  • upper-mississippi-river-pool-19
  • usgs-606e14fed34ef99870162be7
  • wisconsin-lakes
isopen False
license_id notspecified
license_title License not specified
maintainer Yer Lor
maintainer_email ylor@usgs.gov
metadata_created 2025-11-22T22:04:21.389342
metadata_modified 2025-11-22T22:04:21.389347
notes To evaluate the ability of precipitation-based environmental DNA (eDNA) sample collection and mitochondrial 12S metabarcoding sequencing to reconstruct well-studied fish communities in lakes and rivers. Specific objectives were to 1) determine correlations between eDNA species detections and known community composition based on traditional field sampling, 2) compare efficiency of eDNA to detect fish biodiversity among systems with variable morphologies and trophic states, and 3) determine if species habitat preferences predicts eDNA detection. Fish community composition was estimated for seven lakes and two MIssissippi River navigation pools using sequence data from the mitochonrial 12S gene amplified from 10 to 50 water samples per waterbody collected in 50-mL centrifuge tubes at a single time point. Environmental DNA (eDNA) was concentrated without filtration by centrifuging samples to reduce per-sample handling time. Taxonomic detections from eDNA were compared to established community monitoring databases containing up to 40 years of sampling and a detailed habitat/substrate preference matrix to identify patterns of bias. Mitochondrial 12S gene metabarcoding detectec 15-47% of the known species at each waterbody and 30-76% of known genera. Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) assessment of the community structure indicated that eDNA detected communities grouped in a similar pattern as known communities. Discriminant analysis of principal components indicated that there was a high degree of overlap in habitat/substrate preference of eDNA detected and eDNA undetected species suggesting limited habitat bias for eDNA sampling. Large numbers of small volume samples sequenced at the mitochondrial 12S gene can describe the course community structure of freshwater systems. However, additional traditional sampling and environmental DNA sampling may be necessary for a complete diversity census.
num_resources 2
num_tags 28
title Environmental DNA metabarcoding as a tool for biodiversity assessment and monitoring: Reconstructing established fish communities of north-temperate lakes and rivers